Centering Afrocentricity

AfriqueAfrocentricity: Toward a New Understanding of African Thought in this Millennium
by Molefe Kete Asante, University of Liverpool, England, August 19, 2000 [Edited]

– Africa has been betrayed by international commerce and trade.
– Africa has been often betrayed by the new science of the genetics of food, and the unequal distribution of resources.
– Africa has been betrayed by missionaries and imams who have called our own priests and priestesses false while holding up Africa’s enemies as our saviors.
– Africa has been betrayed by education, the Academy, and the structure of knowledge imposed by the Western world.
– Africa has often been betrayed by its own leaders who have shown a talent for imitating the worst habits and behaviors of Europe.
– Africa has often been betrayed by the ignorance of its own people of its past. Africans are, consequently, the most betrayed of contemporary humans.

People so often betrayed must take a serious look at their own approach to phenomena, to life, to existence, to knowledge. The betrayals do not have to continue, nor must we resign Africa to the trash heaps of history as some contemporary Africanists and non Africanists have claimed.

A continent and a people with such incredible potential can rise to meet any challenge, but our thoughts must become truly our own thoughts, separated from the enslaving thoughts of those who have sought racial domination. Of course, when I speak like this, I am speaking of Africa in the context and spirit of Garvey. I accept that the African world is not merely a geographical entity but a world entity whether by our own making or as is most probable by the making of the assaults and attacks and aggression against African people. We are found in every continent and we occupy positions of influence in countries as widely separated as Brazil and the United Kingdom.

My aim is to help lay out a plan for the recovery of African place, respectability, accountability, and leadership. The theme of this conference takes us to the very core of the future of human interaction by seeking to examine Western knowledge, its structure, its relationship to conquest and domination, and its prosecution as an instrument to retain a white racial hierarchy in the world.

We know that Africans have thought about the universe longer than any other people. The people of the world have been Black longer than any other skin color. In fact philosophy itself originated in Africa and the first philosophers in the world were Africans.

The African tradition is intertwined with the earliest thought. Yet from the beginning of Europe’s interest in Africa the European writers referred to ancient African works as “Wisdom Literature,” in an effort to negatively distinguish African thinking from European thinking. They could not conceive of Africans as having philosophy. Philosophy was meant, in their minds, to indicate [their] reflection; that was possible only with the Greeks. They constructed a Greece that was miraculous, built on the foundation of a racial imagination that established a white European superiority.

Since philosophy was seen during the neo-classical period of European history as the source of all other arts and sciences, philosophy was the chief discipline. They saw it in the context of Darwinism where even knowledge was structured hierarchically. Indeed, I still remember how in the southern United States, during my childhood, whites prohibited Africans from operating large machinery because it was considered much too intellectual.

Numerous European writers glorified the achievements of the mind of the Greeks. A Greek stood at the door of every science in the European mind. There were no secrets that had not been discovered by the Greeks. They owed allegiances to no one. They were immaculate, without blemish, isolated from every other people as the standard by which the world was to be judged. Whether in art or science, in sculptor or mathematics, in astronomy or literature, they had no equal and were without antecedents.

However, according to the tradition of Western thought, it was in philosophy that the Greeks excelled. As Theophile Obenga says, others may have had religion, stories, wise sayings, and wisdom literature but the Greeks had philosophy. This was the highest of all disciplines and it was only through the minds of whites that philosophy came to the world. Yet we know that the word philosophy is not Greek, although it came through the Greeks to English and other European languages.

Seba, wisdom, the ancient Mdw Ntr word is the earliest example of reflective thinking. In fact, on the tomb of Antef I, 2052 BCE we see the first mention of wisdom.

The word sophia, wisdom in Greek, is derived from the more ancient word SEBA, the African word. To say in Greek “philo” is to say brother or lover [or son]. One normally says that a philosopher is “a lover of wisdom.” But the ancient Africans had come to this understanding long before there was a nation of Greeks. Indeed the first serious thinkers or philosophers were not Greeks. This means that not only is the word philosophy not Greek, the practice of philosophy is not Greek, but African.

Thales who lived around 600 BCE is usually thought of as the first Greek philosopher. Some claim that it was Pythagoras who was a younger contemporary of Thales, but I claim, with most Greek scholars, that it was Thales since he is said to have told a young Pythagoras,

“You must do as I have done and go to Egypt to learn philosophy from the Egyptians.”

Advice which Pythagoras followed and went to Egypt, spending twenty three years at the feet of such venerable African teachers as Wennofer.

There were several select places where various aspects of philosophy such as social ethics, natural laws, metaphysics, and medicine were taught. One could study at the Temple of Ptah at Men-nefer, at the Temple of Bast at Bubastis, at the Temple of Hetheru at Dendera, at the [temple of Ausar] at Abydos, at the Temple of Amen at Waset, at the Temple of Heru at Edfu, at the Temple of Ra at On, and the Temple of Auset at Philae. Indeed, scholars and others could assemble at scores of other sites from Siwa to Esna for intellectual discussion and discourse.

No city, however, was as rich in temples and schools as Waset where the temples of Amenhotep III, Seti I, Nefertari, Hatshepsut, Tuthmoses III, Mentuhotep, and the Ramesseum were in full flourishing from the Middle Kingdom to the New Kingdom period.

Kemet, the ancient name of Egypt, showcased a considerable body of thought that had been amassed over many centuries. By the time some Greeks starting coming to Egypt as students in the 7th and 8th centuries the philosophers of Egypt had already created vast libraries of histories, science, politics, and religion.

Along the Nile River Africans thought about the nature of the universe, the condition of good and evil, human relations, the administration of society, the character of the afterlife, the idea of beauty and the nature of the divine with intense reflection.

It is time we wrest the study of early Africa from any comparison with Europe because Europe is not in the same league with its antiquity. We will become far more insightful about our own cultures as we gain deeper knowledge of our own societies in relationship to continuities, migrations, land tenure philosophy, family relationships, governance, writing styles and techniques, and the nature of morality in African terms.

Perhaps one day the names of our earliest philosophers will be as familiar to us as the names of the Greek philosophers are to us today. Why shouldn’t the world know the names of the philosophers who set the stage for [their] civilization?

Imhotep, 2700 BCE, earliest personality recorded in history. We know that he understood volume and space, because he was the builder of the Sakkara pyramid. He was the first philosopher, the first physician, the first architect, and the first counselor to a king recorded in history. The reports of his life and his work on the walls of temples and in papyri indicate the esteem in which he was held.

Ptahhotep, 2414 BCE, first ethical philosopher. He believed that life consisted of making harmony and peace with nature. All discourse on the relationship between humans and nature must give credit to the life of Ptahhotep.

Kagemni [Kagemini], 2300 BCE, the first teacher of right action for the sake of goodness rather than personal advantage, came upon the human scene as an African philosopher nearly eighteen hundred years before Buddha.

Merikare, 1990 BCE, valued the art of good speech. His classical teachings on good speech were recorded and passed down from generation to generation.

Sehotepibre, 1991 BCE, the first philosopher who espoused a sort of nationalism based in allegiance and loyalty to a political leader.

Amenemhat, 19991 BCE, the world’s first cynic. He expressed a cynical view of intimates and friends, warning that one must not trust those who are close to you.

Amenhotep, son of Hapu, 1400 BCE, was the most revered of the ancient Kemetic philosophers. Next to Imhotep, he was the epitome of the philosopher. They people deified him as a god, as they had deified Imhotep. He was called the most knowledgeable thinker of his day.

Duauf, 1340 BCE, was seen as the master of protocols. He is concerned with reading books for wisdom, the first intellectual in philosophical history. Reading he said was the best way to train the mind.

Amenemope 1290 BCE promoted the philosophy of manners, etiquette, and success.

Akhenaten, 1300 BCE, promoted Aton as the Almighty One God.

All these philosophers were hundreds of years before any Greek philosopher. Indeed, Homer, the first Greek to write something that was intelligible lived around 800 BCE. But he was not a philosopher. He traveled and studied in Africa.

Kung Fu Tzu, 551 BCE, the great Chinese philosopher, who believed that humans could make the Way great, was a contemporary of Siddartha Buddha, 563 BCE, the Indian philosopher, and Isocrates who lived around 550 BCE.

Too many Africans are dislocated, detached, isolated, decentered, or disoriented. This state is useful economically and politically for the West and not so useful for Africa and Africans. The value of Afrocentricity is to improve our position based on intellectual and philosophical grounds by cutting the ground from under any movement that teaches Africans to view themselves as marginal agents in the world, not central to Europe.

Read more: http://www.ipoaa. com/afrocentricity_toward_new_understanding.htm



One comment on “Centering Afrocentricity

  1. Pr Fall says:

    AFRICOM GO HOME : No Foreign Bases in Africa is shot within the context of the fiftieth anniversary of the “Independence” of African states (OAS 1963-2013). It’s an anti-propaganda, not-for-profit film dedicated to raising public consciousness by opening up a space for discussion and building a sound information base drawn from archival records.

This documentary represents my views, and my views alone, on geopolitical challenges to both Africa and the wider world. The contents of this film can in no way be ascribed to GRILA or any of its members. It addresses Africa’s leaders, all PanAfricanists, internationalist and especially the African Youth caught up in the maelstrom of Africa’s place in the world.

Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s